Product interface

Designed around GCC clinical workflows.

A real Adiba answer brings the case, evidence grade, citations, and regional context into one calm workspace for Arabic and English-speaking care teams.

Screenshot of the Adiba clinical workspace showing a cardiology question, Grade 1A evidence answer, GCC context, and primary sources.

Clinical workflow

From question to evidence, without leaving the clinical frame.

Adiba keeps the product experience close to how cardiology teams already think: ask the clinical question, review the recommendation, check the strength of evidence, then inspect the primary sources.

01Ask in clinical language

Start with a case or a focused cardiology question. No Boolean syntax, no separate literature workflow.

02Review a structured answer

The answer separates current innovation, strength of evidence, applicability, critical gaps, GCC context, and sources.

03Act with the evidence visible

Evidence grade, source trail, and focus controls stay on-screen so teams can explain decisions clearly.

Product details

The controls that matter at the point of care.

The detailed product view keeps patient context, subspecialty filters, and evidence thresholds visible without adding interface drag.

Adiba structured patient context panel with fields for age, diagnosis, medications, allergies, eGFR, potassium, blood pressure, and LVEF.

De-identified patient context

Clinicians can add only the details that matter, with PHI-safe reminders built into the workflow.

Adiba subspecialty dropdown with cardiology options.

Subspecialty focus

Filter questions by heart failure, post-MI, atrial fibrillation, arrhythmia, or preventive cardiology.

Adiba evidence strength dropdown with high, medium, and low options.

Evidence strength control

Teams can choose high, medium, or low evidence views before asking the question.